Benders Triptorium: Books, Music and Artworks

Where outlaw verse meets cosmic thirst.

Menu
  • Home
  • Poetry gear
    • Poetry backpacks
    • Poetry bags
    • Tshirts
    • Poloshirts for men
    • Poloshirts for women
  • Collections
    • Castles get kicked in the bricks series
    • Philosophy Shirts
  • Languages
    • English books
    • Dutch books
    • Deutsche bucher
    • Livres Francais
    • Poesia Espanol
    • Libri italiano
    • Livros portugueses
    • Russian books
    • Books in mandarin
    • Books in arabic
  • Blog posts
    • Philosophers notebooks
    • Writers and poets
    • Castle stories
    • Weblog
      • Psychosupersum
      • Mushroom philosophy
      • Literature vault
  • Music
    • Music
    • Mantra Dance
    • Kroes den Bock
    • Spotify Lists
      • Top 200 of Modern Hip Hop – Global Chart Curated by Diskjokk Murtunutru
      • Alien Music from Other Planets
      • 34 Hours with Feargal Sharkey Striking at Wonders
      • German NDW & New Wave Essentials
      • German Songbook – The Best Tracks and Lyrics
      • Anarcho Punk: Raw Power, Pure Energy
      • Psychedelic Peace – The Final Hippie Selection
      • Top Reggae from the Gamma Quadrant
  • Literature in
    • English
    • Italiano
    • Nederlands
    • Deutsch
    • Turkish
    • Russian
    • Spanish
    • French
    • Chinese
    • Arab
    • Portugese
Menu

Fechner’s Arboreal Ontology: Consciousness Rooted in the Cosmos

Posted on May 28, 2025 by admin

On the Ontological Implication of Arboreal Metaphors in the Philosophy of Gustav Fechner

In the annals of philosophy, amidst the glaring torches lit by Cartesian dualism or Kantian idealism, there dwell thinkers whose visions, though tentacular and bizarre, emit a subtle phosphorescence unfelt by the untrained eye. Among them stands Gustav Theodor Fechner (1801–1887), better known for his psychophysical inquiries, yet deserving of fresh metaphysical excavation. In our present essay, I aim to interlace faculties both philological and ontological to elucidate a single, yet deeply significant, kernel in his thought—Fechner’s recurrent employment of arboreal metaphor in articulating consciousness—not merely as a poetic ornament, but as a deeply faithful correspondence to a panpsychic ontology.

To wit: Fechner entreats the reader to conceive of the cosmos as a great tree, where each leaf represents an individual consciousness, and the whole an “All-Geist” (All-Spirit), internally unified. It is easy for the casual interpreter to mistake this metaphor as illustrative pedagogy merely—a device by which the complex notion of panpsychism might be made digestible for minds formed in a Cartesian mold. However, if we dig beneath the metaphor’s florid bark, we find that Fechner’s arboreality is no figural fancy but the natural excrescence of his philosophical architecture.

Fechner’s principal metaphysical contribution emerges in his book “Zend-Avesta: On the Life after Death,” not to be confused with the Zoroastrian scripture of similar name, but rather a treatise grounded in the notion that the soul is not only concurrent with bodily existence but survives in higher iterations after bodily dissolution. Herein, Fechner introduces arboreal imagery in glowing terms, comparing the human soul to a leaf on a cosmic tree, which partakes of the whole even in its individual life-cycle. But what distinguishes this image from a mere theological comfort is its implication of nested consciousness.

Fechner posits, contra the fragmentation of selfhood so typical of psychiatric materialism, a model whereby organism and environment, psyche and cosmos, form concentric circles of awareness. The tree donning its leaves is not passive substance but sentient bearer of partial minds. This vision undercuts the usual top-down or bottom-up explanation of consciousness, offering instead a lateral, ecological emergence of mind, where awareness lives at all levels in different degrees of clarity.

The subtlety I seek to extract, herein, resides in Fechner’s repeated return to vegetative life when defining both the teleology and substrate of spirit. It is significant that he does not employ mechanical metaphors, nor clocks, nor engines—preferred imagery of Enlightenment mechanists—but trees, roots, and leaves. This is not incidental. In his lesser-known volume “Nanna: On the Soul-Life of Plants,” Fechner attempts a serious reconsideration of vegetal sentience, expressing belief that plants are conscious at a rudimentary level. This, far from New Age pantheism, is part of a rigorous revaluation of animate being.1

Thus arises the ontological claim smuggled beneath the green leaves of metaphor: that all differentiation in consciousness is gradational, never absolute. That is, there is no ontological chasm between human subjectivity and vegetal life, but a continuity of innerness differing by degree, not kind. From this proceeds a dismantlement of the anthropocentric prejudice in philosophy of mind—a grander impulse that philosophers such as Whitehead or Deleuze later echoed, though rarely credited to Fechner.2

Fechner’s arboreal metaphor thereby performs more than mere pictorial service; it carries a doctrine of multiplicity in unity—a metaphysical dendriticism, if I may coin an uncouth term. The spiritual ecology proposed therein paints a living cosmos whose parts, far from autonomous machines, “participate the whole through the rhythmic exchange of breath and death.” In this manner, death does not sever the leaf from the tree, but returns its elements to be regathered—an image of both resurrection and redundancy.

Fechner’s subtlety lies also in the implicit ethics of such a worldview. If the tree feels—the leaf, the branch, the root—and these do not stand as arbitrary illustrations but reveal actual gradations of sentience, then injury to a being is never morally neutral. The deep ecology movement and animal rights philosophy might have benefited from Fechner’s counsel long before their birth. That they did not perhaps reflects more on the parochialism of 20th-century Anglo-American philosophy than on the depth of Fechner’s insight.

Furthermore, Fechner’s stratified unity provides an alternative to the dilemmas haunting the doctrine of mind–body dualism. Cartesian dualism renders inner experience rudely private, marooned behind skull and skin. Fechner, by contrast, posits a continuity of soul that flows through the fabric of the cosmos like sap through vascular bundles—not reducible to body, but coextensive with all forms. The ‘All-Geist’ thus is not an external deity, nor a metaphysical abstraction, but what one might call the world’s own self-registration.3

What is most evangelic in Fechner’s quiet revolution is its synthetic power—the ability to preserve the profound insights of religion (interconnectedness, a purposeful cosmos, the immortality of spirit) without recourse to dogma or supernaturalist cosmogony. The tree becomes, not a symbol, but a schema of being that holds within its rings epochs of metaphysical import. In the arboreal cosmos, perception is not a solipsistic error but a mode of cosmic memory localized; death is not annihilation but decoupling and reintegration. Each subject is as a bud, temporarily individuated, always already sinking back into the unity of the root-mind.

Fechner’s metaphysical tree, then, opposes the atomistic and mechanistic tendencies that dominate today’s cognitive sciences as they did in Fechner’s time. Belief in discrete minds, like belief in discrete particles, fails to observe the interdependent field of consciousness. The notion of “leaf-minds” grants relation primacy over substance—a heretical, perhaps even mystical, ontology whose implications we are only beginning to trace.

In conclusion, by returning attentively to what may be dismissed as metaphor, we uncover in Fechner a philosophy that radically decentralizes the human and reanimates the world with nested layers of sensing presence. The tree is not an image of order, but the order itself incarnate—breathing, remembering, suffering—and perhaps forgiving. Such is the foliage of Fechner’s vision: an infinite canopy of sentient being, conscious in its beauty and beautiful in its consciousness.

Let us then no longer say “we are alone,” nor “we think therefore we are,” but rather: we leaf, therefore we live.

By Martijn Benders – Philosophy Dep. of the Moonmoth Monestarium

consciousness, panpsychism, Fechner, metaphysics, arboreality, ontology, vegetal philosophy

—

1 See Gustav Fechner, “Nanna: Oder, Über das Seelenleben der Pflanzen” (Leipzig: Leopold Voss, 1848). English transl. by Seba Rees forthcoming.

2 Alfred North Whitehead acknowledges Fechner’s psychophysical parallelism in “Process and Reality” but neglects his vegetal metaphysics. Cf. Whitehead, Process and Reality, corrected ed., ed. D. R. Griffin and D. W. Sherburne (Free Press, 1978), p. 112.

3 Fechner’s “All-geist” predates and in many ways anticipates Teilhard de Chardin’s “noosphere,” although arising from a fully immanent rather than teleological framework.

Post Views: 33
Category: Philosophy notebooks

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Castles Get Kicked in the Bricks each Summer

Let’s face it: some backpacks just carry your stuff. This one tells your entire life philosophy in one ridiculous, multilingual joke. Imagine strolling into a museum, a bus stop, or your ex's new wedding—with a bag that declares, in ten languages, that castles are always the losers of summer.

Why? Because deep down, you know:

  • Tourists always win.
  • History has a sense of humor.
  • And you, my friend, are not carrying your lunch in just any nylon sack—you’re carrying it in a medieval meltdown on your shoulders.

This backpack says:

  • “I’ve been to four castles, hated three, and got kicked out of one for asking where the dragons were.”
  • “I appreciate heritage sites, but I also think they could use a bit more slapstick.”
  • “I’m cute, I’m moopish, and I will absolutely picnic on your parapet.”

It’s absurd.
It’s philosophical.
It holds snacks.

In short, it’s not just a backpack—it’s a mobile monument to glorious collapse.

And honestly? That’s what summer’s all about.

Philosophy thirts

Feeling surveilled? Alienated by modernity? Accidentally started explaining biopolitics at brunch again? Then it’s time to proudly declare your loyalties (and your exhaustion) with our iconic “I’m with Fuckold” shirt.

This tee is for those who’ve:

  • Said “power is everywhere” in a non-BDSM context.
  • Tried to explain Discipline and Punish to their cat.
  • Secretly suspect the panopticon is just their neighbour with binoculars.

Wearing this shirt is a cry of love, rebellion, and post-structural despair. It says:
“Yes, I’ve read Foucault. No, I will not be okay.”

Stay tuned for more philosophical shirts and backpacks, as we at Benders are working on an entire collection that will make even the ghost of Hegel raise an eyebrow.

© 2025 Benders Triptorium: Books, Music and Artworks | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme
Scroll Up