On the Quiet Arithmetics of Johann Georg Hamann: A Metaphysical Reading of Language’s Numerological Intimacy
Among the shadows of the Enlightenment, amidst the clang of forging Reason into the apparatus of State and Science, there flutters a lesser-sung prophet: Johann Georg Hamann (1730–1788), the so-called “Magus of the North.” Known largely through the lens of his more illustrious contemporaries—Herder, Kant, even Hegel who characterized him as a “thinker of genius”—Hamann’s work is typically apprehended via its romantic adumbration of revelation, a stormy retaliation against the crystalline pretensions of critical philosophy. But within this boisterous opposition, often misread as merely reactionary or poetic, lies a subtle metaphysical strain: the arithmetic substrate embedded within language itself—a numerological intimacy that silently operates beneath Hamann’s otherwise exuberant scriptural rhetoric.
This article concerns itself with that subtlety: the epistemological significance of Hamann’s ciphered attention to the quantitative nature of speech, and how this devotion to the ‘numbered’ word undermines both pure rationalism and naive empiricism. By viewing language itself as a divine arithmetic, Hamann does not reject Enlightenment mathesis but rather subverts it from within, recasting it as an occult grammar of Being.
To begin, it must be understood that Hamann’s resistance to rationalism was not irrationalism, but counter-rationalism. The error of the Enlightenment thinkers, for Hamann, lay not in their elevation of reason per se, but in their instrumentalization of it, their rendering of thought into operations devoid of existential weight. Language was, in this context, demoted to mere vehicle—a vessel of propositions, preferably numerical or geometrical, transmittable and dissectible, like specimens under Kant’s ‘pure concepts of the understanding’. For Hamann however, language was itself the ground of cognition, a living medium of presence and absence, a paradoxical fusion of voice and silence. And crucially—though often overlooked—it was measured. It had weight.
In his 1780 letter to Christian Jacob Kraus, Hamann writes cryptically: “Words are coins, minted from God’s breath, counted in His silence, spent through the souls of men.”¹ Here we see at least three numerological assertions embedded in metaphor: (1) speech bears divine origin, (2) its issuance is countable (coins, minted, spent), and (3) its true arithmetic is not quantitative in the empirical sense but ontological. That is, every utterance partakes not of a logical calculus as in Leibniz or Boole, but of a karaite arithmetic—divine, hidden, ineffable. Hamann’s metaphysical disquiet with Kant lies partially in this implicit numerology: whereas Kant’s categorical framework discretizes cognition into logical functions, Hamann sees such taxonomization of the intellect as a betrayal of the numeric holiness inherent in all word-flesh. In this way, to speak is already to compute—but in allegory, not algorithm.
One of Hamann’s most enigmatic essays, the “Aesthetica in nuce” (1762), reads like a theosophic veil, and is conventionally understood as an aesthetic rebuke to the sterile logic of his day. But beyond aesthetics, there lies this numerological reconsideration of sensuality and abstraction. Consider the passage: “The smallest stroke in a letter, the bent of a vowel, may contain more world than volumes of demonstration; for it is measure before thought, rhythm before rule.”² This seemingly rhetorical flourish is in fact a radical claim: language, down to the graphemic quark, operates as pre-cognitive measurement—it is calculative not post hoc but ab initio.
Thus Hamann modifies the hierarchical schema of epistemology. Language is not merely expressive; it is constitutive. Its anatomy is already arithmetic. Phonemes lie coiled in combinatorial possibility, their morphology reverberating with ontic consequence—consonants as integers, vowels as ratios. The mimetic theory of language, so derided in early Plato, is here inverted: the world does not produce language by virtue of similarity; it is the Logos—that numerically seeded Word—which first yields the cosmos. Genesis is not narrative but numeral, misunderstood as metaphor.
A peculiar corroboration of Hamann’s view finds unexpected echo in Pythagorean mysticism, particularly the tetraktys: the idea that all harmony stems from the first four integers, summing to ten, the divine totality. Hamann’s refiguration of language as both divine symbol and arithmetical operation draws upon similar instincts. Every sentence is a “ten” in embryo—a completed unity forged from elemental strokes. The spiritual danger of Enlightenment philosophy, in Hamann’s telling, was not merely that it demystified the cosmos, but that it disfigured its sacred arithmetic, mistaking the formal for the final.
It is also illuminating to juxtapose Hamann’s vision with that of his contemporary Moses Mendelssohn, who attempted to reconcile rationalism and revelation, and for whom mathematics represented the quintessence of intellectual clarity. Where Mendelssohn saw geometry as a model of divine reason, Hamann saw it as a petrification of divine mystery. In a rebuke likely aimed at Mendelssohn, he writes: “Mathematicians are the Jesuits of abstraction—they exchange infinity for the zero of precision.”³ This biting denunciation reveals Hamann’s insight: the precise may be accurate, but it lacks resonance. The ‘zero’ of precision is the evacuation of the sacred numeric which lives not in sum, but in symbol.
Let us not err in assuming that Hamann’s quiet arithmetics reduce to a medieval numerology estranged from rigorous thought. Rather, his metaphysics of language offers a proto-phenomenological critique strikingly prescient of later thinkers—most notably Heidegger, who would likewise return to language as the ‘house of Being.’ Yet Hamann’s uniqueness lies in his insistence that this house is already counted—divinely so.
In conclusion, to read Hamann’s work superficially is to imagine a mad mystagogue defying the march of Reason. But to attend to his numerological attentiveness—to his view of words as spiritual units, divine numerals in the syntax of Being—is to glimpse a radical philosophy in which mathesis is redeemed, but transfigured. Thus, the Magus of the North offers us not a refusal of Enlightenment arithmetic, but its sacramental inversion. Language does not merely describe the world; it weighs it. The whisper of every word is also its measure.
By Martijn Benders – Philosophy Dep. of the Moonmoth Monestarium
language, proto-idealism, metaphysics, numerology, Enlightenment, Hamann, phenomenology
—
¹ Johann Georg Hamann, Briefe an Christian Jacob Kraus, 1780.
² Hamann, “Aesthetica in nuce,” trans. J. Schmidt (Cambridge: Enlightenment Underground Press, 1997), p. 24.
³ Hamann, “Wolken. Ein Nachspiel,” in Sämtliche Werke, vol. 5, ed. J. Nadler (Munich: Kösel, 1950), p. 146.