People ask how I make my works. Is it A.I.? Well, no and yes and no and no. Eighty percent is photoshop, but I use eight different pieces of software to get to the final result. There is AI involved in the process, but people who believe that you cant use AI to make art would have been the same people who tell you ‘its that magic box that takes the photographs, not you!’ Any command in photoshop was a form of a pre-baked prompt that executed a primitive form of A.I. – so basically, one can’t philosophically argue that using prompts and commands would cause photoshop to be the real creator of the work. Its just…utter bullshit, but its coming from the same idiots that brought us the brilliant cookie laws.

I am a huge fan of the Adobe software and one of their paid subscribers. The new Photoshop has A.I. built into it, and it’s so awesome – I can now create into great detail what I can imagine.

This work is named ‘The Basket’ and I can print it sharply at no less than 3 to 5 metres. The entire
picture is about a gigabyte in size.

This year i will work on an exhibition that focusses on these new techniques and impact – and I will explain into detail how I use AI in the creative process, and how it’s a form a philosophical amateurism to claim A.I. cannot train on known works, as that is the process every painter in the world follows.