The Spiral Threshold: Traversing the Liminal Verse of Gustaf Munch-Petersen
Among the glacial syntax of early 20th-century Danish poetry wandered a singular voice—fragile, flickering, agonically metaphysical. The poet and painter Gustaf Munch-Petersen (1912–1938), often relegated to the obscure footnotes of Scandinavian modernism, was equal parts fevered expressionist and crystalline philosopher. He burned fast—dying at the age of 26, volunteering for the International Brigades during the Spanish Civil War—but left behind a fractured corpus of poems and sketches that continue to perplex and illuminate.
Munch-Petersen was born into an artistic family in Copenhagen. His mother, the writer Karin Michaëlis, and his father, the painter Mads Munch-Petersen, shaped his early aesthetic sensibilities. His upbringing was steeped in rigorous idealism punctured by existential doubt. Enrolling at the University of Copenhagen in 1930 to study literature and art history, he soon abandoned formal education, seeking something he called “the raw architecture of the inner threshold.” His first collection of poems, *Det nøgne menneske* (The Naked Human), appeared in 1932, and immediately marked him as a spiritual predecessor to later surrealists.^1
Yet his work resists easy categorization. While he aligned himself with no manifestoed movement, Munch-Petersen’s writings straddle expressionism, surrealism, and mystical existentialism. He wrote not for clarity but for “the flash between two moments where language briefly refracts being.” His poetic lines often explode across the page, unconcerned with meter or classical form. Consider a passage from *Det nøgne menneske*:
> “jeg vil ind i tingene gennem mit forsvindende jeg
> og stemningen uden ansigt vil sluge mit øje.”^2
(“I want into things through my vanishing self
and the mood without a face will devour my eye.”)
It is not just a lyric, but an epistemological attempt—a grappling for the sense of presence in pure instability.
By 1935, Munch-Petersen had started producing surreal pencil sketches accompanying his texts, wherein dreamlike figures with skeletally thin arms and bulked heads floated unsettlingly through uninhabited landscapes. These cross-medium works were not auxiliaries but essential to his philosophy of blurred boundaries. For him, delineation—be it between image and word, the self and the world, or life and afterlife—was an illusory violence.
When the Spanish Civil War broke out, his growing despair over fascism led him to join the International Brigades. Bizarrely, his letters from the front reveal not political zeal, but metaphysical anticipation. In a letter dated April 2, 1938, he wrote: “The bullets call not for my end but for my merging. I am soot in the crucible of man’s eternal division.” He was killed mere weeks later, somewhere near Gandesa, his body never found, his passport later discovered in a heap of unknown belongings.
If his biography verges on the theatrically tragic, it is in his texts that one meets the true precipice. The poem *drømmebillede* (dream-image) touches a profound chord with readers after epochal ruptures:
> “jeg vil ikke findes, men bøje som grenen bøjer
> i vinden, som ikke har nogen retning.”^3
(“I do not wish to exist, but to bend like the branch bends
in the wind that has no direction.”)
These lines haunt, not because they negate being, but because they reconstruct being as a fluid participation in the oscillation of chaos and form. Munch-Petersen believed there was no “I” as commonly understood. He returned again and again to what he called ‘bøjningen’—‘the bow’ or ‘the bend’—a metaphor for entering into material without violating it with conceptual violence. In many ways, this relates to Spinoza’s ethical monism or even early Zen notions of no-self—though he arrived at these intuitions through dream, ink, and ruin.
His posthumously published *Ud af en oprørsk mund* (“Out of a Rebellious Mouth”) deepens this. In it, we encounter a poetic speaker who no longer writes from a human position, but from a threshold space. The titular poem ends with the lines:
> “jeg vender tilbage som frø
> ikke som mig, men som den stilhed der findes efter råb”^4
(“I return as seed
not as myself, but as the silence that follows a scream.”)
What makes this more than melancholy is the precise philosophical position it invokes. Silence is not emptiness, but the ontological layer beneath assertive identity. Reflecting on such passages sheds light on how Munch-Petersen collapsed the dialectic of presence/absence. He posited the scream not as expression but as the last illusion of ego, the silence after as real genesis.
Herein lies the essence of his brilliance—and his unsettling relevance for our time.
Even now, in an age where image floods language and the self is algorithmically partitioned into data shards, Munch-Petersen speaks across the century with a radical phonelessness. His sense of the human was non-binary, non-verifiable, endlessly twitching between transformation and effacement. To read him today is to dwell in ‘threshold perception’—a viewing of reality from within its folds. He does not ask us to solve existence. Instead, he invites us to bend within it, as a branch does, in a wind that “has no direction.”
This philosophy, gently anarchical, tugs like a tide.
We can find solace—and perhaps strategy—in his refusal to concretize vision. When I first held a tattered copy of *Det nøgne menneske*—unearthed in a Reykjavik archive—the paper bore clear scent of mildew and ocean. The verses danced half-eroded from time, and yet laced through them was that same unwavering commitment to what I can only call glacial honesty. To be honest, in Munch-Petersen’s sense, was not to say what is true. It was to surrender to being remade constantly by what refuses containment.
And what is more honest—or poetic—than that?
By Martijn Benders – Notebook Dep. of the Moonmoth Monestarium
language, proto-idealism, metaphysics, footnotes, heresy, surrealism, existential-threshold
—
^1 See Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Lars. *Radikale Mønstre: Modernisme og Identitet i dansk Litteratur* (Gyldendal: 1998), p. 214–223.
^2 Munch-Petersen, Gustaf. *Det nøgne menneske* (Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 1932), p. 17.
^3 ibid., p. 56.
^4 Munch-Petersen, Gustaf. *Ud af en oprørsk mund* (Posthumous Collection, Forlaget Vindrose, 1971), p. 43.